Tag Archives: media bias

Disgusting media bias never stops

Just today, I saw these two examples of media bias.  I am sure there are many others, as we are being blatantly or slyly brainwashed in an effort to get obama re-elected.  And, of course, there was the debate which I believe was a staged event, probably with CNN and the  obama campaign in collusion, but no probably about it, Candy disgraced herself in bias.  She was like a mom and obama like a child, crying “Candy, Candy, Candy” when he got backed into a corner due to his lies and deceptions.  And Candy comes to the rescue on cue.

Little Tommy Tucker, Sang for his supper, Ma! Ma! Poor little innocent guy.

I get this image of a little boy tugging at his mommy’s coattails.

But back to these two examples:

Again and again and again, what you always see from our corrupt media is that as soon as one of their Corrupt Narratives turns against them — all of a sudden that Corrupt Narrative suddenly vanishes from the media dialogue. For months, all we heard from our Narrative Gatekeepers was favorability, favorability, favorability. And why? Because it helped Obama.

…..

But we don’t hear a whole lot about favorability anymore, do we?

Why is that?

Here’s why:

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has finally cleared what many aides have long seen as his biggest hurdle: A majority of voters now like him.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/10/19/media-Ignores-Romney-Favorability

Next,

Us Magazine writes a story about the dresses worn by Ann Romney and Michelle Obama to the presidential debate.  Their headline reads:

“Ann Romney Wears $1,690 Oscar de la Renta Dress to Presidential Debate”

…..trying to advance the democrat/media hatefulness toward the Romneys for having money.

Yet, Michelle’s dress costs twice as much, $3,290. And that little detail was down in the story and did not rate the headline.

Now, honestly, if an issue is to be made of the cost, common sense would tell you that the one that cost the Most would rate the headline, right?  And besides that, Ann Romney bought her dress with her own money and anyway you look at it, Michelle is using money that came from the American people.

And, oh my god, I just thought of the ridiculous, stupid, childish way in which the obama media and the democrats have seized on a simple phrase about binders to try to find some negative narrative they can blast for days on end.  What an insult to women.  He made a perfectly good example of how he did a good thing in hiring women for the highest positions in his Mass cabinet, and all they can do is talk about binders?

Is there any fairness in the media?  No.  Only corruption.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/18/us-weekly-headline-blares-cost-ann-romney-dress-though-first-lady-cost-twice/#ixzz29nKi4r00

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/10/18/Us-Touts-Expense-of-Ann-Romney-s-Dress-Buries-Higher-Cost-of-Michelle-Obama-s

Posted:  10.19.12 A. D @ 8:30 p.m.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Candy won the debate

CNN poll showed that obama won by 46 obama/39 Romney.  But on substance and issues, Romney was a clear winner.

Who would better handle the economy:  58 Romney/obama 40

Who would better handle healthcare:  49 Romney/obama 46

Who would better handle taxes:  51 Romney/obama 44

Who would better handle deficit:  50 Romney/obama 36

The whole town hall setting seemed like a grand production to me.  The audience was not undecided but on the obama’s side, as evidenced by the applause when Candy threw her considerable weight around trying to help the president.  The crowd was cold, almost hostile to Romney. This kind of town hall set up has been done before by obama, with liberal plants asking the questions.  It came across as staged and we know the questions were prescreened and preselected by Candy.

In the end, unlike the first debaate, obama got out all the usual talking points but a couple of important questions remain unanswered:

1.  Does he agree with Chu that he wants energy prices to skyrocket.

2.  How many drilling permits has he cut.

3.  Why did he say the attack in Libya was the result of a video for at least two weeks, even  saying so before the United Nations 14 days later.

4.  Why were the Americans at the consulate in Libya left with zero secuirty in spite of begging for protection.

Candy tried.  Her career as a journalist should be over as she was almost out of breath trying to knock Romney off his game.  But then it was known  beforehand that she was and is an advocate for obama.

At one point, when she was interrupting Gov. Romney, Candy said “they will run me out of town….”  Now, who would run her out of town if she did not make sure Romney did not “get away” with anything?

Why do the republicans agree to all these liberal moderators?  I’d like to see Mark Levin moderate a debate.

Posted:  10.17.12 A. D. @ 8:05 a.m.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

ABC’s George Stephanopoulos tries to declare debate a tie

George immediately came out while the families were still on the stage after the debate with “Does a tie go to the challenger?” trying to build obama up from a crushing defeat.  I wonder if George is paid from obama campaign funds or straight from the U S Treasury. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/10/04/Stephanopoulos-embarrasses-himself-spins-debate-as-tie

Last week, he was already positioning a win for obama in the upcoming debate, as see below:

Just last week, Stephanopoulos posted a video on his blog in response to one  of his Twitter followers who asked if the momentum of the presidential race  could change with the debates.

“(Here’s) the predicament that Mitt Romney faces right now,” explained  Stephanopoulos. “You go back to the last 19 elections, in 18 of them the person  who was ahead at this point, late September, 40 days out, has won the race,” adding that the former Massachusetts governor’s “back is certainly up against  the wall right now.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/03/stephanopoulos-debate-obama-democrats/#ixzz28MXFSGTe

I don’t think Romney will give the little obama tool a job and I hope ABC goes belly up for their shameless bias, misleading and lying to the American people.

Posted:  10.04.12 A. D. @ 6:38 p.m.

Leave a comment

Filed under Media, politics, Uncategorized

Corrupt biased Obamamedia

“And that little humpy dog is Chris Matthews.”  🙂  They should have put F. Chuck Todd on the other leg.

Posted:  09.17.12 A. D. @ 10:40 a.m.

1 Comment

Filed under Media

Chuck Todd has no credibility, relegated to Olbermann-ville

Exerpt from “Fact-checking the Obamamedia”:

But rather than protect the First Amendment from our over-reaching government, Todd toadies and parses to make excuses.

No one has sold more of his reputation in 2012 than Chuck Todd. Even if His One wins reelection, Todd has forever relegated himself to Olbermann-Ville. No one will ever trust him again — nor should they.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/09/14/Insta-Fact-Check-Live-Blogging-Obama-Media-Sept14

This is true of Chuck Todd, for sure, but I think it is true of the entire leftist corrupt media.  Nobody believes them.  It’s not easy to regain credibility once completely lost.  This disdain for the media is spreading like wildfire.  And they are letting little Andy Rooney, whatever his name is, the white house press spokesman, get away with lying thorough his teeth claiming a stupid you tube caused this massive outbreak of savages in the middle east.  Remember when we were watching on tv the knocking down of the statue of Sadam Hussein and his spokesman was saying “Hussein is strong and in charge of everything?”  The reality is the administration ignored warnings, and even now the president is doing mundane things as if he is skipping through daisies.  Makes me wonder about his mental health.

Posted:  09.13.12 A. D. @ 1:35 p.m.

Leave a comment

Filed under Media

Ohio coal miners support Romney

This will bring tears to your eyes and joy to your heart.  This is was last Tuesday – just now seeping out.  This would make a nice news story, wouldn’t it?  I would have been interested in hearing about it, but it’s not something the corrupt obama media would want anyone to know about.

This is from Gateway Pundit.

Ohio miners turn on Obama. Hundreds of coal miners and their families stand in line while waiting to attend a rally at the Century Mine near Beallsville, Ohio, for Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney Tuesday, Aug. 14, 2012. (I’m 41)

Republican presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney greets coal miners during a campaign rally at American Energy Corportation in Beallsville, Ohio. Mitt Romney is wrapping up his multi state bus tour with campaign events in Ohio. (Toledo Blade)

Posted:  08.19.12 A. D. @ 10:24 p.m.

5 Comments

Filed under Media, politics

Behold the deeply embedded bias of the liberal media.

This is just what I was referring to in my previous post.  Obama gets down and dirty and starts the brutally negative assaults and then when Romney responds and asks him to “take his negative campaign back to Chicago” it is BOTH sides bringing down the tone of the campaign.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/08/14/Politico-equates-Romney-campaign-and-Obama-campaign

This excerpt below, of an article written by Amy Gardner and Phillip Rucker refers to Romney as “unhinged.”  When the fact it is clearly obama who is the unhinged one.  But he can throw all the mud he wants to, to ridiculous degrees, and Amy and Phillip don’t say a frigging word.

Joe Biden makes an unacceptable and offensive statement about republicans wanting to “put people in chains” to a largely African American audience, and I heard an obama spokesman say that comment was okay with them.  Then Romney responds to such a ridiculous statement, and biased Amy and Phillip puts it like this:

But the high-minded campaign has not come to be. Four days in, Romney’s campaign accused Biden of alluding to slavery, Obama joked about the time Romney drove his station wagon with the family dog on the roof, and Romney called the president “intellectually exhausted.”

So, Biden makes the comment inferring the republicans are going to put “y’all back in chains,” which is not condemned but really accepted as all right, and it is Romney who has brought down the tone of the campaign.  Perfect example!But the high-minded campaign has not come to be.

Of course, if Romney does not respond in some way, a spokesman will come out and, as I heard one already, “Well, the negative attacks on Romney are working and he just didn’t get out FAST enough to rebut them.

But why didn’t the “high-minded” campaign come to be?  Because obama and his minions are not going to allow it to be.  And the corrupt liberal media is right in there helping him all they possibly can.

We are not nearly as stupid as these people think we are.  This is going to be a landslide election for Romney.  Mark my word.

Posted:  08.15.12 A. D. @ 12:28 p.m.

Leave a comment

Filed under politics