Tag Archives: John Roberts

Did Roberts cave to media pressure and the Bully ‘Bama?

As legal scholars study the Supreme Court’s decision in the Obamacare case, more and more are concluding that Justice Anthony Kennedy’s dissenting opinion, striking down the law in its entirety, was once the majority opinion–and that Chief Justice John Roberts switched his vote at a late stage. If so, it would appear that the Chief Justice may have succumbed to the bullying meted out by President Barack Obama, who attacked the Court in the aftermath of oral arguments in March, when Obamacare seemed headed for certain defeat.  http://alturl.com/e547p

Justice Kennedy visibly upset about decision:   http://alturl.com/6grm3

If Roberts did this for media approval he is a fool.  Because the very first time he rules in a way the “NYT” does not agree with, they will try to ruin him any way.

Posted:  07.02.12 @ 8:42 a.m.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

ODAMNACARE ruled constitutional

No comment. Just no comment.

Posted: 06.29.12 A.D. @1:07 p.m.

Leave a comment

Filed under Courts, politics, Uncategorized

Dirty, sexy money

For the second day in a row, reporter Claire Shipman touted the story of an RNC staffer who submitted expense accounts after taking a donor to a strip club in Hollywood. Shipman’s piece featured a clip of CNN anchor John Roberts gloating, “It’s a story of dirty, sexy money” and of fellow cable host Rick Sanchez imploring, “Someone need to tell me how to spend $2000 at a topless club.”

Other journalist snippets included Chris Matthews chiding, “The latest embarrassment for the RNC during the reign of Michael Steele.” On Monday, after Shipman detailed expenses Steele reported including limo usage and private jet travel, she opined, “It’s the sort of spending controversy that sounds so, well, pre-recession.”



You have got to be kidding me.  “Dirty, sexy money.”  Isn’t it comforting to know that these “journalists” are so cncerned about republican money.  I do believe the money is from private donations, right?  Then what business is it of theirs?  They hate republicans.  You would think they would be happy to see republican money wasted.  But let me say this:  who would have thought the republican party would be associated with dirty sexy money?

And somehow they always mention Michael Steele’s name, when he was nowhere near the scene of this so-called bondage club.  I think it could be a racist attack on Mr. Steele.  It has to be because otherwise why would these “journalists” want to malign him in this way.

You would think they want you to believe it was Michael Steele who was at the club.  So this is a vicious racist attack on him.

And besides that, surely they don’t object to republicans using their own money to try to put a little life in this party of  no.   All they want to do is have a little fun.  🙂  🙂  Why, Meghan McCain may have even recommended it.  Loosen up, like, people.

http://currentcelebrity.onsugar.com/Quincy-Jones-Still-Partying-7610012

http://www.exposay.com/paris-hilton-celebrity-sightings-at-voyeur-in-west-hollywood-on-november-12-2009/v/34266/1/

http://www.wireimage.com/ItemListings.aspx?igi=426104&nbc1=17

But as far as I know, and as far as I believe, Mr. Steele is pretty much an upright guy, and I think these newscasters know he is.

Oh, wait, he did say drill, baby, drill.    🙂

I was a little upset with how much money Nancy Pelosi spent of TAXPAYER money for all her travels, food, and liquor while the country is in recession.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) has spent or authorized spending at least $3.2 million on trips, hotels, food, high-priced liquor, and military jet rides in the past two years.

You think maybe CNN and MSNBC could focus on all the tax money being wasted daily?  Well, no, they can’t, they won’t – until the republicans take the place over soon.  Then they’ll be all over it.

Posted:  03.31.10

10 Comments

Filed under Human Interest, Media, politics, Uncategorized

The Smearing of Sarah Palin by the Media

Keith Olbermann: “I’d love the governor or anybody else repeating those talking points to give us the names of those news organizations that have actually questioned whether or not mothers have a right to sit in office. But we haven’t heard that list yet.”

Chris Matthews: “I sit here waiting for that list of major news organizations who have questioned her motherhood or her right to become Vice President, given her motherhood. I don’t think it has ever happened.”

“There’s also this issue that on April 18th, she [Palin] gave birth to a baby with Down’s Syndrome….Children with Down’s syndrome require an awful lot of attention. The role of Vice President, it seems to me, would take up an awful lot of her time, and it raises the issue of how much time will she have to dedicate to her newborn child?” –CNN’s John Roberts on the August 29th, “Newsroom”

“Adding to the brutality of a national campaign, the Palin family also has an infant with special needs. What leads you, the Senator, and the Governor to believe that one won’t affect the other in the next couple of months?…She has an infant — she has an infant with special needs. Will that affect her campaigning?” -ABC’s Bill Weir on “Good Morning America,” August 30.

“Is she prepared for the all-consuming nature of the job?…Her first priority has to be her children. When the phone rings at three in the morning and one of her children is really sick what choice will she make?” -Washington Post’s Sally Quinn, in an August 29, online column.*

–>http://newsbusters.org/blogs/geoffrey-dickens/2008/09/05/matthews-olbermann-deny-media-doubted-palins-maternal-fitness

Now, these questions are coming from the “couple”, Olbermann and Matthews, who were in such a state of ecstasy that they were speaking in tongues after Barack Obama’s acceptance speech. If you don’t believe me, just click this youtube and see for yourself:  (Sorry, video removed by You Tube)

–>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Q2WRNiQFf4

The media in general, and MSNBC in particular, are so far into the tank for Barack Obama that even the far-left Bill Maher, on his HBO show Friday night, (the Friday night after the speech) recognized “there is a problem…with the media gushing over him too much.” Specifically, though he didn’t name co-anchors Chris Matthews and Keith Olbermann, Maher pointed to MSNBC’s coverage following Obama’s acceptance speech: “The coverage after, that I was watching, from MSNBC, I mean these guys were ready to have sex with him (Obama).”

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2008/08/30/maher-matthews-olbermann-were-ready-have-sex-w-obama

But back to Sarah Palin, I believe there are many more instances of the type of references that are listed above, but they are good examples of the bs that was being put out by the press and the media immediately after McCain chose Sarah Palin as his running mate, and also doesn’t include the fact that the New York Times had three hatchet articles on their front page. *I saw Sally Quinn on yesterday detracting her statement.  She said she had “re-thought” it.

Posted:  09.06.08

43 Comments

Filed under John McCain, life, Media, politics, Uncategorized