Tag Archives: Jim Crow

Wasserman Schultz made statement on CNN which she now denies

Well, can you say bald faced lie?  I thought at first this was referring to one of these video/audio recordings that can barely be heard, but NO, she said this on CNN.  A lie is a lie is a lie.  Here she is doing demo talking point, actually, how the republicans want to do mean and horrible things like “they want to take us back to Jim Crow”  because some believe a person should present a picture ID to vote.  I have always been asked for an ID and I don’t mind at all.  How does one do anything in this country without a picture ID?

I believe these people, like Wasserman Schultz (and Jay Carney yesterday) depicting “republicans” (or really anybody who has a different view from them) in these outrageous ways are insulting the American people such as myself who think it’s fine to require an ID and also who support the Ryan budget.  Neither of these things anywhere near makes me “aggressively ignorant” or trying to drag America back to days of Jim Crow.  It isn’t smart to portray those who disagree in those terms.  It is especially inappropriate for those in high positions to do this.

See video:


Posted:  03.21.12 @ 11:59 a.m.

Leave a comment

Filed under politics, Uncategorized

President Obama would not have used the “language” Holder used in calling us all cowards

Well, I read a headline that I thought indicated Obama was maybe reprimanding Eric Holder for his “nation of cowards” comment, but then I saw that he was not.  He is actually agreeing with him.

Here’s what he said:

President Obama, in an interview published Saturday, sought to clarify Attorney General Eric Holder’s recent controversial comments calling America a ‘nation of cowards’ when it comes to race relations.

“I think it’s fair to say that if I had been advising my attorney general, we would have used different language,” Obama told the New York Times aboard Air Force One on Friday. “I think the point that he was making is that we’re oftentimes uncomfortable with talking about race until there’s some sort of racial flare-up or conflict, and that we could probably be more constructive in facing up to the painful legacy of slavery and Jim Crow and discrimination.”

New York Times

So, as usual, any time anybody wants to have a conversation about race, you can be sure it is to once again point out that we must “face up to the painful legacy of slavery and Jim Crow and discrimination.”  And this is precisely why whites don’t want to talk about it.  It’s not a two-way conversation, but only another opportunity to punish us for what happened before we were born.

It is unfortunate that President Obama would feel it necessary and appropriate to bring up slavery and Jim Crow – NOW.  In 2009!

Here’s another take on the subject.

Posted:  03.08.09


Filed under Barack Obama, Human Interest, politics, President Barack Obama