The self-declared Islamic State capital is currently experiencing some signs of the times and is in the throes of an epidemic and a number of members of the Islamic State have reportedly been infected.
Efforts are reportedly being made to prevent the further spread of the Leishmanias is skin disease, which is highly virulent, in the IS stronghold.
The disease is spread by flies that are attracted by the rubble and rubbish of war.
Okay. What is he doing? In his speech today he made reference to a group in Syria called the Khorosan or Khorasan Group.
Where the heck did that come from and who are they? Supposedly they are some part of al Qaeda. That’s the explanation so far.
Last night, we also took strikes to disrupt plotting against the United States and our allies by seasoned al Qaeda operatives in Syria who are known as the Khorosan Group. And once again, it must be clear to anyone who would plot against America and try to do Americans harm that we will not tolerate safe havens for terrorists who threaten our people.
See transcript of speech at link:
Suffice it to say, I do not trust him, a man who has lied to us numerous times, to the point where I think that the truth is not in him. He will say anything to get his desired result and after that, he does not care if it comes out he lied. It’s done. Too late.
Now, he said ISIS was not Islam. Of course, they are Islamic, but who does he say they are? Is he contending that Khorogan is also not Islamic?
I am also very suspicious of his coalition, a coalition of Arab countries led by Barack Hussein Obama? What is wrong with this picture? I heard someone say that ISIS was a Sunni organization. And I also heard the Arab nations led by Obama are also Sunni. So do we have Sunni vs Sunni? Can’t believe anything you hear on the corrupt media, but none of it adds up to me, all the more reason I am wondering what he is doing.
They are all Muslim of one kind or another. They are all Islamic.
So we have Barack Hussein Obama leading Arab/Muslim countries in a battle against – who knows?
What will time tell? I am waiting to see. But when it is revealed, will it be too late? Is it already too late?
God help us.
P. S.: Just saw where Holder is teling Katie Couric that Khorogan could be more dangerous than ISIS. That’s hard to imagine, but looks like the lying administration is shifting from ISIS over to Khorogan. Smoke and mirrors. All is deception with these people.
And we need him NOW.
“We’re not going to just shoot the sons-of-bitches, we’re going to rip out their living goddamned guts and use them to grease the treads of our tanks. We’re going to murder those lousy
Hun [islamic] cocksuckers by the bushel-fucking-basket. War is a bloody, killing business. You’ve got to spill their blood, or they will spill yours.”
When you’re fighting satan, you must be blunt.
When Barack Obama refers over and over to the Islamic State as ISIL, he is sending a message to Muslims all over the Middle East that he personally does not recognize Israel as a sovereign nation, but as territory belonging to the Islamic State.
Now you know why Obama says that he has no plan, no goal, and no stated aim for dealing with ISIS. But he does have a plan, and it’s a really nasty, diabolical one. Obama’s plan is to drag his feet for as long as he can, doing only the bare minimum that Congress forces him to do. His “plan”to buy ISIS as much time as possible to make as many gains as they can.
This is a scenario that keeps coming to my mind: Just what if he sits back and lets this bunch gain more and more power from now till the end of his term? Then, instead of leaving office, he “comes out” as their leader which at that point, the reality will be
The United States of America has fallen.
For two years, the American people have demanded to know the truth surrounding the events of September 11, 2012, in Benghazi, Libya. That was the night that four Americans were killed in terrorist attacks against a U.S. diplomatic mission and nearby CIA annex, attacks that were initially blamed on an anti-Islam video by an Obama administration in full campaign mode.
See more at:
This is at least a big part of why ISIS had to become ISIL in obamaspeak – to get that word “Syria” out, as it directly connects them. Rest assured, obama never does anything which does not advance his position – not a word is left to chance. And his position or agenda? You don’t have to take my word for it that it is Anti-American. Just take a look at what he does. He appears clueless and disengaged on purpose so that he can claim the first he knew of anything is “he read it in the newspaper.” Did you notice he used that very ploy when he gave his recent “we don’t have a strategy” speech. He made this brilliant statement: “I think what I’ve seen in some of the news reports suggests that folks are getting a little further ahead of where we are at than we currently are.” He’s made quite a sacrifice to bring down America, I guess, in that he would rather come across as a fool and idiot than to publicly accept any responsibility for it.
And the phony video story he and Hillary and the administration told shows in just what low regard every one of them views Americans, that we should believe such a ridiculous lie.
ISIS or ISIL? Why this Obamaspeak? What is the difference? I noticed Obama used the term ISIL in his speech, so I take it, it does have considerable meaning. I’m not sure why he has chosen to refer to the terrorists in Iraq in that way, but I am sure it will become apparent at some point.
What difference does. it. make, you may ask? It most certainly helps his position or image in some way.