Tag Archives: Hillary Clinton

They should be in jail, instead they get AWARDS!

Ha.  Funny and pathetic.  On the day of the Benghazi whistleblowers hearing, the culprits and liars get awards.  That’s what they do, the democrats do something wrong and they give each other awards.  So on the eve of and on the day of the hearing  which nailed them for lying, incompetence, derelictions of duty, and cover up in the deaths of four Americans , Hillary gets some public service award and Susan Rice gets a Great American award.



Posted:  05.09.13 A. D. @ 4:15 p.m.

“Woe unto them that call evil good and  good   evil.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

“Democracy” is really breaking out in Libya

This is democracy?

Oh, yes.  We are officially standing with this.

Kadafi captured alive and then scheduled for trial…..

Nope.  Tortured then Shot in the head.

I am beginning to understand what Ron Paul is talking about.  What you want to bet we are sending money to these animals.

(Even before Gadhafi’s death, the U.S. moved swiftly to assist Libya’s National Transitional Council, providing the rebel-led group with financial assistance. In July, the U.S., along with allies in Europe and the Middle East, recognized the NTC as Libya’s official government. And last month, the U.S. ambassador to Libya returned to Tripoli to lead a newly reopened American Embassy in a post-Gadhafi era.) http://news.yahoo.com/us-focused-promoting-democracy-libya-160624008.html

Hillary Clinton in Libya visit to support democracy

18 October 2011 Last updated at 13:01 ET

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has travelled to Libya on an unannounced visit aimed at showing support for the Libyan people and building ties.

Mrs Clinton held talks with top officials from the NTC – Chairman Mustafa Abdul Jalil, Prime Minister Mahmoud Jibril and Finance Minister Ali Tarhouni.

She is the first US cabinet-level official to visit since Col Muammar Gaddafi was ousted.

She said the US offered support to all those who “believe in democracy” and said people must renounce violence and give up arms.


Fast forward to October 20, 2011:




Arab broadcasters showed graphic images of the balding, goateed Gadhafi – wounded, with a bloodied face and shirt – but alive. Later video showed fighters rolling Gadhafi’s lifeless body over on the pavement, stripped to the waist and a pool of blood under his head.

Standing, he was shoved along a Sirte road by fighters who chanted “God is great.” Gadhafi appears to struggle against them, stumbling and shouting as the fighters push him onto the hood of a pickup truck.

He was driven around lying on the hood of a truck, according to the video. One fighter is seen holding him down, pressing on his thigh with a pair of shoes in a show of contempt.

Really disgusting.

Posted:  10.21.11 @ 11:45 a.m.

Leave a comment

Filed under law and order

Watching brave Navy Seals from the safety of the situation room – Update: staged photo

AP Photo/The White House, Pete Souza

In this image released by the White House and digitally altered by the source to diffuse the paper in front of Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden, along with with members of the national security team, receive an update on the mission against Osama bin Laden in the Situation Room of the White House.

First thing I saw this morning was this photo.  Can you believe this?  I guess Obama thinks he finally got his “Oklahoma City Moment.” Sickening.  Who in the world would be filming this killing?  Did they dispatch a white house filming crew or something?

Why would the white house release such a photo as this if not purely as what they consider to be “good publicity?”  There is no other reason on earth why.  There is a little problem with it though, Obama looks like he’s about 10 years old.  Not a very demanding or commanding presence.

I had noticed the crowd that had gathered, at least what they showed on tv, to celebrate and at the time there was a feeling that something was a little off.  Now I know there is no way that was a spontaneous crowd.  It was all very young people, screaming and pumping fists in unison.  Looked like something out of Egypt or Libya.  And the huge American flags…..no way do these young people have a brand new American flag just hanging around in their apartment.  Many were almost glistening with newness with creases very prominent having just been removed from the packaging.  Who provided the flags?  Where would they get them at 10:30 at night?  So who had organized them?  Probably an Organizing for America or ACORN operation.

I  give all credit and honor to the Navy Seals.  Brave men putting their lives on the line while these punks sit in perfect safety watching it like some porno flick or something.  And then have gall to release it for publication.  Who would even think to have the AP there to take the picture?  Stinks.

And when I add this photo to the statement I heard that Obama had made yesterday, “the country is united as they were after 9/11” there is no doubt in my mind they are thinking of this purely in political terms.  All PR as it relates to Barack Hussein Obama.


The administration is trying to convert its successful killing of Osama bin Laden into domestic political clout, as it faces  a tough summer of deficit-debates, rising gas-prices and and stubborn unemployment numbers.

The political “unity that we felt on 9/11 has frayed a little bit over the years, and I have no illusions about the difficulties of the debates that we’ll have to be engaged in, in the weeks and months to come,” President Barack Obama told a White House dinner for Hill chairmen and chairwomen last night. “It is my fervent hope that we can harness some of that unity and some of that pride [sparked by the bin Laden killing] to confront the many challenges that we still face,” he said at the close of his short speech before the dinner.

Update:  Now I’m hearing the whole thing was staged.  I guess they were staring at a blank screen.  Everything is staged with this bunch.  But I should have known since the photo was an AP photo, so they had to be called in to take it.  I thought that Hillary was the only one who looked horrified at what she was seeing, but now she says it was just allergies.  🙂   And to think these clowns are in charge of the country.  Now that is horrifying.

Posted:  05.03.11 @8:18 a.m.  Updated:  Added the Daily Caller link 05.03.11 @ 10:53 a.m.  Updated:  05.05.11 @ 6:35 p.m.


Filed under Barack Obama, patriotism, politics, President Barack Obama, President Elect Barack Obama, Uncategorized

Anthony Weiner speaks – again – obsesses over Glenn Beck

Anthony Weiner on Glenn Beck’s audience:

“Well he has less than 300,000 viewers,” Weiner said. “And so that’s about 150,000 shoes in his audience. You know I think that frankly what has happened is that — I could have gone two ways with that – the number of teeth, the number of shoes. I wasn’t sure what kind of audience you had.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/02/05/weiners-bizarre-attack-beck-viewers-he-300k-viewers-150k-shoes/#ixzz1D7kjx2vp

In the same segment, he also went after Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, and his wife.

Anthony Weiner has made so many insulting remarks about Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, and specifically about the people who associate themselves with them, about republicans, both on tv and on the floor of the House of Representatives.  He has attacked Beck’s sponsors, especially gold, which really is none of Weiner’s business.  Is this America or not?  Beck can speak and people can listen or not listen.  And I am having trouble  believing the outright disrespect and loathing for a Supreme Court Justice.

To me this is one of the down and dirty tactics of the left to try to put somebody out of business and destroy their jobs.  But they do or try to do it time and time again.  And the reason they do it is simply because a person dares to utter something they don’t agree with.   But we don’t have to go any further back than the democrat’s hypocritical “call for a new tone and civility” and just since that time, he has carried on as usual, the above show being just last night, I believe.

Not only do these people smear the public figures, but they go further and smear the listeners and/or supporters of the public figures, which extends to ordinary people like me.  And, by golly, I do have shoes and teeth, too.  I am tired of being implicated as racist, dumb, violent, and even in mass murder.

So, you know, who is this man and who does he think he is?  I have found some interesting items about Mr. Weiner, and since he attacks Mrs Thomas, his spouse as well.

He wanted to be, and I think still does, Mayor of New York City, but he can’t seem to win the election.  He’s tried at least twice.  He now represents the 9 district of New York in the House of Representatives.   It appears he has always been a little man with a big mouth. I wish I knew just how little he is, as in how tall.  He looks to be maybe 5’3″ or so and maybe 125 pounds soaking wet.

The New York Observer has described him as:

“long and stringy, narrow shoulders, an ostrich neck, Vulcan ears, a nasal voice that, close your eyes, could stand in for Woody Allen’s.”

And I wouldn’t disagree with that, but they may be being kind to him. I would add that he probably has a very small body part, as in his “man parts” as “Megan McDowell” would say.

There are lots of examples of his tirades on You Tube.  The above link on the Daily Caller has a video of the Bill Maher show where he most recently made his comments.

He said something about Glenn Beck having 300,000 viewers.  That is another thing they do, make inaccurate statements knowing they are inaccurate and nobody challenges them on it.  Glenn Beck has about 2.5 million viewers any day at 5:00 p.m., more than all the others in that time slot put together.

About a year ago Weiner got married to Huma Abedin.  She was an aide for Hillary Clinton during her campaign, and she still works for her in the State Department.  How much does she make, Mr. Weiner?  You are so worried about Mrs. Thomas and her salary and activities.

He’s “over the moon.”

It seems the new Mrs. Weiner was pretty darn close to Hillary, so close as to result in rumors such as this. But I guess it isn’t true, since she married Weiner.  But who knows, maybe it’s just hard to tell the difference between Anthony and a girl.

Huma is Muslim and Anthony is Jewish, an intriguing combination. She is part Indian and part Pakistani, and after aged two, lived in Saudi Arabia until returning to the United States to attend college. Her parents are Syed Zainul Abedin and Saleha Mahmood Abedin. Let’s see, Pakistan….. Saudi Arabia, probably a spy. One could make up a whole scenario on that. I’m sure she is a thoroughly nice person, but why would she marry him? Hmmm, looks like I’m not the only one to have this idea.

Now, here’s an odd one – Anthony Weiner and Jon Stewart were roommates after they got out of college, along with a girl.  So friends or lovers or ménage à trois?  Who cares.

He appeared as a guest on Jon Stewart’s show and they both agreed that Joe Lieberman was a dick (even though Lieberman was so bi-partisan which is what they say they want but don’t.)  He might not want to throw that word around too much with a name like Weiner.

Posted:  02.05.11  Updated:  02.06.11 @10:57 a.m.


Filed under politics, Uncategorized

Never trust a reporter and never believe the liberal media (Update)

Update at bottom.

I’ve been researching a little bit on the author of the Rolling Stones article on General McChrystal,

He’s clearly a left-leaning, progressive, probably democrat, person who does not care much for republicans, almost to the point of revulsion.  He was assigned to several campaigns during this past election, Mike Huckabee, Rudy Giuliani, who he has a particular distaste for, John McCain, and most importantly, Hillary Clinton.

This is his own account of the campaigns he covered.

I’ll bet you anything he was feeding the Obama campaign every little tidbit he could come up with. And if you have wondered how Obama knew so much about the inside of the Clinton campaign, here’s the answer.

McChrystal had a civilian communications specialist assigned to him named Duncan Boothby. He’d been there about a year, well within a time span to have been hand-picked himself.  Boothby resigned immediately after this story broke, I believe on Tuesday, even before McChrystal suffered his fate.

My thoughts are that it was Boothby who cleared Hastings and probably Boothby who was the source of most of the comments attributed to a “close aide or adviser.”

It just all stinks to high heaven. It’s not as if McChrystal called a news conference and disrespected civilian leaders. No, this little reporter ingratiated himself to the group and followed them around, hoping they would get drunk and “loosen up.” Maybe all reporters do this sort of thing, which is why I would not trust one EVER. But he seems extra slimy to me.

So Duncan Boothby authorized Hastings, but who contacted Boothby about it?  Just say, if the administration wanted for some reason to get McChrystal out, what better person than someone like Mr. Hastings who had proved himself in the past (as during the campaign).

So they get him in there, he picks up any dirt he can find or dig up, write up the story as if it were McCrystal who said all the things himself, and publish it in Rolling Stone magazine.

But, and here’s the important part, before it comes out, coordinate with the “state” media as to how to pick out certain phrases and play them up, ruin the man even before the story is in print.  Get it done and imbedded in everybody’s mind before they can read the article themselves and find out that most of the statements were actually said by someone else.  Somebody tells you what somebody else said, this is called hear-say.

It just fits together so perfectly.  But why did they want Patraeus in that spot?  Maybe to set him up for failure, seeing as how he was Bush’s guy?

Then, on the other hand, some believe the General set it up himself in order to get out of his assignment.

Either way, somebody set it up.  This was not just the normal course of events.

But the way the media isolates words, using them to smear a person the way they are experts at doing just has to stop.  They should not have this power.  I mean, who hasn’t said something about their boss or someone they don’t care for, or who they are disappointed with in an unguarded moment, and especially if drinking in a social, casual setting.

Just be sure there’s no reporter with a tape recorder and a pad anywhere within hearing distance, one with a plan and an agenda.

Never trust a reporter.

UPDATE:  A few hours ago I read a story by Washington Post and I should have taken a screen shot of it, but I didn’t.  I wanted to go back to it just now and it is almost impossible to find it in any search machine.  Finally did locate it but the headline has been changed, and I don’t know how much of the story line.  There was a woman reporter the first time.  Now her name is there and another name is added.  So obviously somebody got to them and they changed it.

It said basically that the reporter violated their off the record conversations.  The new headline waters it down to say that there is a disagreement between the McChrystal sources and the editor of the Rolling Stone.

They “fact-checked” by sending a list of questions.  Here’s a take away example.

In the last question, the fact-checker asked: “Did Gen. McChrystal vote for President Obama? (The reporter tells me that this info originates from McChrystal himself.)”

Boothby replied in all capitals. “IMPORTANT — PLEASE DO NOT INCLUDE THIS — THIS IS PERSONAL AND PRIVATE INFORMATION AND UNRELATED TO HIS JOB. IT WOULD BE INAPPROPRIATE TO SHARE.” He went on to describe the “strict rules” under which military personnel keep their political views to themselves.

In the article, Hastings reported that the general “had voted for Obama.”

Bates said that the remark was “absolutely” not off the record, and he noted that Boothby’s appeal “isn’t on accuracy or even that it was off the record,” but that it was irrelevant. He said the magazine, like other news organizations, had no obligation to warn sources that they had made unwise remarks.

Boothby absolutely begged them not to print who McChrystal voted for and they did it anyway.  Low down.

I guess they won’t talk to a slimy reporter again, huh.


30 questions:  http://hotair.com/archives/2010/06/25/pentagon-official-rolling-stone-made-mcchrystals-staff-think-they-were-speaking-off-the-record/

Posted:  06.25.10  Updated: 06.25.10 @ 11:15p.m.


Filed under Barack Obama, Human Interest, Media, patriotism, politics, President Barack Obama, Uncategorized

What democrats said about the “nuclear” option in 2005

Are the democrats the biggest hypocrites on the planet?

This video is making its way throughout the internet.

Too funny.  Listen to the democrats and what they said about the nuclear option in 2005 during the Bush administration, including comments from our president, then Junior Senator Barack Obama and now Vice President Biden.  The same nuclear option they want to use in order to pass Obamacare against the will of the American People.  Hypocrites!

NOTE:  56% DO NOT approve of the health care being jammed through.  They don’t care what we think.  Talk about tyranny.


AGAIN:  They are defying the will of the people if they go through with this.

Posted:  02.24.10

1 Comment

Filed under Barack Obama, Financial Crisis, health care, Human Interest, politics, Uncategorized

Take poll on Hillary’s future

Take the poll at Newsbuster Poll on Hillary’s future

Choices Are:

Run for president in 2016

Run for president in 2012 if Obama is vulnerable

Return to the Senate

run for governor of New York

Posted: 07.29.09

Leave a comment

Filed under Barack Obama, Human Interest, politics, Uncategorized