Tag Archives: CPAC

What’s going on with Begala, Carville, Stephanopoulos, Rahm Emanuel and Susan Rice’s husband?

This from Newsbusters on Monday.

Back on January 29, we discussed the daily strategy phone call engineered by Obama’s Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel for friendly TV commentators and “reporters.” Politico reported that Emanuel has a daily phone conference call with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, and CNN’s James Carville and Paul Begala. With Rush Limbaugh’s raucous CPAC address, as he termed it his “first address to the nation,” we can see at least one example of what is likely an attack strategy resulting from the Emanuel phone session with a rush to bash Rush the day after the appearance.

And then this today:

The unholy alliance between the White House and ABC’s George Stephanopoulos goes beyond mere conference calls with President Obama’s Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel.

The executive producer,  Ian Cameron, of ABC’s George Stephanopoulos “This Week” is married to newly-confirmed United Nations Ambassador, Susan Rice.

Did they cook up this Bash Rush Limbaugh scheme?  Some are saying they did.  Reportedly, they all talk daily.  So we have the Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel consulting? talking with?  phoning? Paul Begala, James Carville, and George Stephanopoulos every day – and we find the U. N. Ambassador, Susan Rice, is married to the Executive Producer of Stephanopoulos’ ABC program.

I don’t believe they have denied these every day “strategy” calls.  Anderson Cooper asks Begala last night if they are working with the White House as part of a concerted effort to bash Rush Limbaugh Here. I’m not sure what his answer was.  Please listen for yourself.  Guess it depends on what the meaning of “concerted” is.  Of course, Begala already called Limbaugh a corpulent drug addict so I guess that speech at CPAC just played right into their plans.

Posted:  03.05.09

4 Comments

Filed under Human Interest, Media, politics, President Barack Obama, Uncategorized

CNN’s Bill Schneider thought Rush Limbaugh’s speech was “angry”

What?  Angry? I don’t think so.

I’ve been thinking about this for a couple days.  I heard this on Saturday when CNN immediately cut to the following analysis of Rush Limbaugh’s speech at CPAC.  It is such a prime example of the wholesale media bias practiced by CNN.  This speech was on CNN and Fox but not MSNBC because they were on their Doc Block format (where they give almost unlimited airtime to prisoners) or I would probably include them in with CNN.

But this is pretty funny.

BILL SCHNEIDER: (CNN chief “analyst”) Well, it was an angry tone. He was the hero of 1994. Fifteen years ago when Republicans won a big victory in Congress. And that was the year of the angry white men. When they came to power they honored him as being the prophet who led them to victory. Well, this was a very angry speech. By the way, they’re not all white and they’re not all men but they are angry conservative voters. They didn’t do so well last year but they’re still angry. The tone of this speech was mocking, bullying, it was full of contempt, and I thought it was a very harsh speech. One that while it rallied the conservative audience it also angered a lot of Democrats and people who aren’t particularly partisan just by the tone of it.

And he also repeated the distortion that Limbaugh said he “wanted Obama to fail” which anybody with an ounce of fairness in them knows that is not what he said.
Here’s what he really said and it’s been twisted and misquoted and taken out of context over and over. But even if he did say he wanted Obama to fail, what of it? I don’t suppose anybody, not anybody whatsoever ever  hated and wanted Bush to fail. Nah.

But here’s the direct quote from the earlier interview with Sean Hannity:

LIMBAUGH:  Look, he’s my president. The fact that he is historic is irrelevant to me now. It matters not at all. I — if he is going to implement a far left — look it. I think it’s already decided. $2 trillion in stimulus? The growth of government. I think the intent here is to create as many dependant Americans as possible looking to government for their hope and salvation.

If he gets nationalized health care, I mean, it’s over, Sean. We’re never going to roll that back. That’s the end of America as we have known it because that’s then going to set the stage for everything being government owned, operated, or provided.

Why would I want that to succeed? I don’t believe in that. I know that’s not how this country is going to be great in the future, it’s not what made this country great.

So I shamelessly say, no, I want him to fail, if his agenda is a far- left collectivism, some people say socialism, as a conservative heartfelt, deeply, why would I want socialism to succeed?

And why, indeed?

But getting back to Mr. Schneider, did he even watch or hear the speech?  I doubt it.  Mocking?  Bullying?  Full of contempt?  Please.  This is just such a great example of the manipulation the MSM engages in.  Schneider says, “It was a very angry speech.”   And not only that, it was “full of contempt and very harsh.”

And he didn’t stop there — he said the “conservative voters” are also angry.  🙂 Should I take that personally?

I know a lot of people in this country are busy, they have lives and families and they don’t have time to eat and breath this stuff the way I do, but it is really a shame that the above description of the speech is the only assessment of Rush Limbaugh that many get.  I hope at least some were able to watch for themselves.

In reality, Limbaugh gave a very uplifting and inspiring speech.  There was a lot of laughter, lots of applause.  He ad libs, he talks, he tells jokes, he talks about our country with pride and I loved it.  I haven’t listened to him all that much heretofore, but his 20 million listeners just became 20 million plus at least one.

Here’s the full transcript of the speech.

More on Schneider’s comments.

And some ratings stats from Saturday’s speech:

Fox News and CNN each aired Limbaugh’s keynote speech to the CPAC Saturday afternoon. It was the biggest draw all weekend on cable news.

• From 4:46pm-6:20pmET Fox News averaged 511,000 A25-54 demo viewers and 2.22M Total Viewers. The network peaked at 6pm with 602,000/2.73M. FNC also produced an hour Sunday night at 9pmET with speech highlights which drew 454,000/1.66M. It was Sunday’s most-watched cable news hour.

• CNN added another 222,000 demo viewers and 932,000 Total Viewers for their Limbaugh coverage from 4:47pm – 6:12pm.

• MSNBC stayed with their documentary programming which, from 4pm-7pm, averaged 163,000 demo viewers and 374,000 Total Viewers.

Posted:  03.03.09

Leave a comment

Filed under Human Interest, Media, politics, Uncategorized