Obamacare places power in the hands of a presidential appointed 15 member board to decide what services and care are “unnecessary” for seniors.
Obama said on April 13th this was his goal. This is the Obama Death Panel.
Why does Barack Obama want to kill old people? Right. Why? Why does Barack Obama want to roll grandma off a cliff, plunging her to her death? (Fire with fire)
So what can the next generation, retiring a decade from now, count on? The Obama health law puts those decision in the hands of an unelected board called the Independent Payment Advisory Board, a cost-cutting panel.
The board is a radical departure from Medicare as we’ve known it. Congress cedes nearly all control of Medicare spending on the rationale that budgeting decisions should be shielded from outraged seniors and political pressures.
On April 13, the president reiterated that the board would decide what care is “unnecessary” for seniors, and that he would like to see IPAB’s unprecedented powers increased.
Do you want your life in the hands of 15 people appointed by the president? I sure as hell don’t.
This is the future with Obamacare. Don’t believe the lies the democrats are telling, the accusations that the GOP wants to end medicare. It is not true. It is Obamacare that seeks to change everything, and place the lives of seniors in the hands of a death panel.
April 13, 2011 — President Obama would give additional power to an independent advisory board—one already highly unpopular with Republicans—to wring additional savings out of Medicare, according to a fact sheet the White House released in connection with the president’s speech outlining his deficit reduction proposal.
Obama wants to save $340 billion more by 2021 and $480 billion by 2023, including proposals already included in his budget proposal. He said he aims for more than $1 trillion in savings in the subsequent decade from Medicare and Medicaid.
Also see: http://hotair.com/archives/2011/04/20/ipab-suddenly-under-the-spotlight/
Posted: 05.28.11 @ 6:55 p.m.
Saturday morning testimony brings Tony Lazarro back to the stand to read an IM conversation between he and Casey after a deputy had come to Tony’s apartment and searched it.
This video below is during a recess, jury not present. Her mother is testifying and Casey mouths angry words and cries. Some have said she is saying something to the effect, “she hasn’t cried for three years, now she cries on the stand.” There’s not much doubt she is mad. See comments on You Tube.
Cindy’s testimony contained very detailed stories that Casey had told as to the whereabouts of Caylee. It was amazing the fabrications, even to some story about going to Tampa with Zanny the nanny (a non-existent person) and others, having a wreck with Zanny ending up in the hospital with a concussion. She told Cindy she was at Universal Studios (at a non-existent job) with Caylee who was in an activity group while Casey was in a meeting or something. Cindy decides to actually go to Universal Studios only to find out Casey was not there but in Jacksonville. (Cindy phoned her or texted her from outside to come out and talk to her as she could not go in without special ID) Don’t know where Casey really was. It kind of surprised me the detail, the intricate detail, to which Cindy was able to remember these stories and she related them on the stand as if they were true. So did Cindy believe Casey? I don’t think she did but she wanted to believe her. This inability to see or face the truth is the making of all kinds of sick behavior. And I notice it a lot in people, especially in relation to politics, who want to believe in someone so bad they make all manner of excuses for them and they delude themselves. It does become a mental disorder when everything one believes is based in a lie. Her whole life was a made up story.
Posted: 05.28.11 @ 6:20 p.m.
Amazing web site with unbelivable amount of info, details, photos, transcripts, timelines, just about anything you might want to know about the case: http://www.acandyrose.com/caylee_anthony_directory_index.htm