Daily Archives: January 11, 2011

Jared Loughner’s mother and Giffords attended same synagogue – or did they?

Just some information which may or may not be of interest and may or may not be of any significance and may or may not be true.

Amy Joanne Totman and Randy Loughner were married on April 24, 1986 in Pima County — or perhaps that’s the day they got their license, Arizona state records show. No judge is listed — perhaps suggesting they were married by clergy?

And there is a connection between Loughner and Giffords – they are both jewish and go to the same congregation, Chaverim.  I think this has come to light because Amy Loughner, Jared’s mother, has a maiden name of Totman.

Now that reminds me of Mark Potok, who may or may not be jewish, with the Southern Poverty Law Center.  Which has a connection to this case through Judge John Roll who presided over the following case:

Poverty Law Center (SPLC) report, December, 2006: “An Arizona jury, acting in a lawsuit sponsored by the Southern Poverty Law Center, ordered border vigilante Roger Barnett to pay $98,750 to a family of Mexican-Americans he terrorized in 2004.”  (The SPLC is well-known for their open borders position and bigoted and vicious attacks on those who propose to curtail illegal immigration.)

Now is Dupnik a jewish name?  I have no idea, but if it is,  Clarence Dupnik could also be a member of the Chaverim congregation where the Giffords and Amy Loughner attended.

Of course, some of this is just speculation or just my opinion, some from digging around on the internet, and some maybe just made up.  Any.body can make things up.

Mrs. Amy Loughner is also a Pima County employee, Pima County of course being the county where Dupnik is the sheriff.  So the two of them could know each other from work, or from attending the same synagogue, and they could have struck up an affair and they could actually be the parents of Jared Loughner.

I know, I know, that’s all just speculation or maybe I just made it all up, but it makes a lot more sense than blaming Sarah Palin or Rush Limbaugh or a few “cross hairs” on a map over a year ago for the murder of six people.

And a funny post I came across by Yid With Lid:


1 Comment

Filed under Human Interest, politics, Uncategorized

Is Arizona massacre Obama’s “Oklahoma City Moment”

From the Politico yesterday:

“In that regard, the shootings in Tucson on Saturday, which he has decried as a “national tragedy,” present a critical opportunity to a president at a crossroads, a chance for Obama to elevate the debased tenor of politics, much as President Bill Clinton attempted in the aftermath of the 1995 terrorist attack in Oklahoma City. It was announced Monday that Obama will travel to Arizona on Wednesday.”

From the Politico on Sunday the 9th:

“They need to deftly pin this on the tea partiers,” said the Democrat. “Just like the Clinton White House deftly pinned the Oklahoma City bombing on the militia and anti-government people.””

I think somebody in law enforcement – the FBI maybe – should look into this .  There is an eerie and uncanny connection to this shooting in Arizona – not to Sarah Palin and the tea party = but to the white house.

Mark Penn, advisor to the president recently made a statement to Chris Matthews on MSNBC as follows:

“President Obama needs to reconnect with the people.  Remember, President Clinton reconnected through Oklahoma.  It wasn’t until that speech that he (Clinton) reclicked with the American people.  Obama needs a similar kind of event”  He drops his voice on that last word but I think he said event.

It wouldn’t surprise me if this video is removed.  Amazed that it’s still up the way things are disappearing.

So let’s be clear here.  It wasn’t Sarah Palin or the tea party who made public their desire to “reconnect” with the people by way of a disaster similar to Oklahoma City.  No.  That is straight from the administration.  Here’s their concern = Obama is slipping in his connection to the people and needs something – anything – in order to reconnect

Gabrielle Giffords has been in the cross hairs of the liberal Daily Kos for a long time.  In June of 2008, Mr. Kos had her on a list of Blue Dog democrats TARGETED by him.  Gabrielle Giffords was on that list and “bolded for added emphasis.”

Well, I’d argue that we can narrow the target list by looking at those Democrats who sold out the Constitution last week. I’ve bolded members of the Blue Dogs for added emphasis.

(I think the vote he is talking about was on FISA)

He then lists the names.  And then adds:

Not all of these people will get or even deserve primaries, but this vote certainly puts a bulls eye on their district.

Gabrielle Giffords has been on the opposite side of some issues held dear by this administration.  In these areas, Sarah Palin and the tea party AGREES with Ms. Giffords.   Remember, Ms. Giffords is a Blue Dog democrat.

Ms. Giffords, along with two other Arizona lawmakers, spoke out publicly urging the president NOT TO SUE Arizona.  This certainly would be an area where Sarah Palin and the tea party would AGREE with Ms. Giffords.  In fact, she was almost a republican.  In fact, just hours before her assassination attempt said on Fox News that she used to be a republican.

Here’s what was reported:

A trio of U.S. House Democrats from Arizona is making a last-ditch effort to discourage President Barack Obama’s administration from suing the state over its controversial new illegal-immigration law.

Reps. Ann Kirkpatrick, Harry Mitchell and Gabrielle Giffords support a comprehensive approach to border security and immigration reform, something Congress has failed to pass despite years of trying. All three, who could find themselves in difficult re-election battles this year, want the administration to focus on practical steps to repair the broken U.S. immigration system and shore up border security instead of suing Arizona.

Now, we all know what happens to people who oppose President Obama’s agenda.  They get TARGETED.  They get the HATCHET.

And let’s not forget that a federal Judge died in this massacre, a republican federal judge appointed by a republican president.  He has barely been mentioned because his death does not fit into the fictional story line that the media has constructed.

See what happens when unfounded accusations fly from a corrupt media, “24 hours a day” broadcasting unfounded speculation to somehow give Obama his “Oklahoma City Moment?”  If we’re just making things up, why anybody can MAKE THINGS UP.

I think Sarah Palin and the tea party, made up of ordinary American citizens, should SUE for defamation and libel.  They could start with the MAINSTREAM MEDIA and Sheriff Duprick, Dipshit, whatever his name is.  Palin has been silent on this so maybe she is consulting her attorney.

But there is ABSOLUTELY MORE evidence that some sinister underground person working on behalf of the present administration was responsible for the Arizona shooting than there is that some how “talk radio” caused it.  After all, how did Jared Loughner get the gun?  Where did he purchase it?  How did he get the money for it?  Maybe Mark Penn or somebody else in the administration gave it to him?  Maybe even the sheriff who is trying with all his might to smear people who had absolutely nothing to do with this tragedy gave it to him.

I heard a rumor that he, Sheriff Duprick, was the GRANDFATHER of the shooter.  Who knows if this is true, but it doesn’t matter.  It fits my scenario here and we don’t need any proof of anything.  Actually, the Sheriff could be the FATHER of Jared Loughner, couldn’t he?  Maybe he had an affair with Loughner’s mother.  Maybe he did, maybe he didn’t.   He could have.  He probably is Loughner’s father.  Is there any evidence of that?  Not yet.  I’m looking into it.

And as to the sheriff, why did he not have security there at this gathering?  He KNEW Loughner had problems, that people were afraid of him, that he had made threats previously.  All of this the sheriff said himself.  If he had been there or had some of his officers there, they would have recognized Loughner and maybe stopped him.

What did Loughner do for a living?  Was he unemployed?  Had he been laid off?  Maybe he was mad because he couldn’t find a job in Obama’s America.

Posted:  01.11.11


Filed under Barack Obama, Human Interest, politics, President Barack Obama, Uncategorized